[PATCH] input: sirfsoc_pwrc: add onkey input driver for CSR SiRFprimaII PWRC
Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com
Thu May 23 12:26:57 EDT 2013
Hi Barry,
Looks very good, just a few nits below.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:13:18AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Makefile b/drivers/input/misc/Makefile
> index d7fc17f..1d66f03 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Makefile
> @@ -60,3 +60,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_WISTRON_BTNS) += wistron_btns.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_WM831X_ON) += wm831x-on.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-kbdfront.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_YEALINK) += yealink.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_SIRFSOC_ONKEY) += sirfsoc_onkey.o
Please try keeping it sorted.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc_onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc_onkey.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3e48db9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc_onkey.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
> +/*
> + * Power key driver for SiRF PrimaII
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
> + *
> + * Licensed under GPLv2 or later.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/rtc/sirfsoc_rtciobrg.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +
> +struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata {
> + u32 pwrc_base;
> + int irq;
Since you are using devm_ interfaces you don't really need to store irq
in the structure as far as I can see.
> + struct input_dev *input;
> +};
> +
> +#define PWRC_ON_KEY_BIT (1 << 0)
> +
> +#define PWRC_INT_STATUS 0xc
> +#define PWRC_INT_MASK 0x10
> +
> +static irqreturn_t sirfsoc_pwrc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *pwrcdrv =
> + (struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *)dev_id;
> + u32 int_status;
> + int_status = sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_readl(
> + pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_STATUS);
> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(int_status & (~PWRC_ON_KEY_BIT),
> + pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_STATUS);
> +
> + /*
> + * For a typical Linux system, we report KEY_SUSPEND to trigger apm-power.c
> + * to queue a SUSPEND APM event
> + */
> + input_event(pwrcdrv->input, EV_PWR, KEY_SUSPEND, 1);
> + input_sync(pwrcdrv->input);
> +
> + /*
> + * Todo: report KEY_POWER event for Android platforms, Android PowerManager
> + * will handle the suspend and powerdown/hibernation
> + */
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sirfsoc_pwrc_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "sirf,prima2-pwrc" },
> + {},
> +}
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirfsoc_pwrc_of_match);
> +
> +static int sirfsoc_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *pwrcdrv = NULL;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + pwrcdrv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pwrcdrv) {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "kzalloc fail!\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * we can't use of_iomap because pwrc is not mapped in memory, the so-called base
> + * address is only offset in rtciobrg
> + */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &pwrcdrv->pwrc_base);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to find base address of pwrc node in dtb\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pwrcdrv->input = devm_input_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!pwrcdrv->input)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pwrcdrv->input->name = "sirfsoc pwrckey";
> + pwrcdrv->input->phys = "pwrc/input0";
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwrcdrv);
> +
> + pwrcdrv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pwrcdrv->irq,
> + sirfsoc_pwrc_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
> + "sirfsoc_pwrc_int", pwrcdrv);
> +
> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(
> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_readl(pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_MASK)
> + | PWRC_ON_KEY_BIT, pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_MASK);
> + if (ret) {
Why do we check only after fiddling with registers?
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwrc: Unable to claim irq %d; error %d\n",
> + pwrcdrv->irq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pwrcdrv->input->evbit[0] = BIT_MASK(EV_PWR) | BIT_MASK(EV_KEY);
> + set_bit(KEY_POWER, pwrcdrv->input->keybit);
> +
> + ret = input_register_device(pwrcdrv->input);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "pwrc: Unable to register input device,error: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sirfsoc_pwrc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
I think it should be CONFIG_PM_SLEEP as it resuyme handling does not
appear to make sense for runtime PM.
> +static int pwrc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwrc_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *pwrcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /*
Trailing whitespace.
> + * Do not mask pwrc interrupt as we want pwrc work as a wakeup source
> + * if users touch X_ONKEY_B, see arch/arm/mach-prima2/pm.c
> + */
> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_writel(
> + sirfsoc_rtc_iobrg_readl(
> + pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_MASK) | PWRC_ON_KEY_BIT,
> + pwrcdrv->pwrc_base + PWRC_INT_MASK);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops sirfsoc_pwrc_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = pwrc_suspend,
> + .resume = pwrc_resume,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
just say
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sirfsoc_pwrc_pm_ops, NULL, pwrc_resume);
> +static struct platform_driver sirfsoc_pwrc_driver = {
> + .probe = sirfsoc_pwrc_probe,
> + .remove = sirfsoc_pwrc_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "sirfsoc-pwrc",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .pm = &sirfsoc_pwrc_pm_ops,
> +#endif
and you do not need ifdef guard here.
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirfsoc_pwrc_of_match),
> + }
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(sirfsoc_pwrc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Binghua Duan <Binghua.Duan at csr.com>, "
> + "Xianglong Du <Xianglong.Du at csr.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CSR Prima2 PWRC Driver");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:sirfsoc-pwrc");
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list