[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
Ian.Campbell at citrix.com
Thu May 2 06:48:28 EDT 2013
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> > > #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> > > @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > > later ones fail to. */
> > > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> > Is this called for the boot processor too?
> > (do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline
> > for this series?)
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git lost_ticks_1
Is that your Xen tree, I was after the Linux one...
> It's based on my 3.9-rc3-smp-6 branch currently in linux-next (that is
> based on 3.9-rc3).
> However lost_ticks_1 is not in linux-next yet.
Which branch is in Linux next? It doesn't seem to be your linux-next
(last commit 2011).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel