[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
Stefano Stabellini
stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com
Thu May 2 06:38:12 EDT 2013
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> > #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> > @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > later ones fail to. */
> > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
> > }
> > +
> > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>
> Is this called for the boot processor too?
Yep.
> (do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline
> for this series?)
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git lost_ticks_1
It's based on my 3.9-rc3-smp-6 branch currently in linux-next (that is
based on 3.9-rc3).
However lost_ticks_1 is not in linux-next yet.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list