[PATCH 2/3] ARM: davinci: da850: Enable EHRPWM TBCLK from CFG_CHIP1

[Philip, Avinash]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:38:58, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On 3/15/2013 10:27 AM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 18:31:52, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> >> On 3/14/2013 4:07 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
> >>> da850 platforms require TBCLK synchronization in CFG_CHIP1 register for
> >>> TBCLK enable in EHRPWM modules. Enabling of TBCLK is done only if EHRPWM
> >>> DT node status is set to "okay" DT blob.
> >>> Also adds macro definitions for DA8XX_EHRPWM_TBCLKSYNC and
> >>> DA8XX_CFGCHIP1_REG.
> >>
> >> So there is actually a TBCLK in DA850 - it's just not modeled as a clock
> >> similar to the way it is done on AM335x? If yes, then instead of adding
> >> a dummy clock node and doing the TBCLK enable as part of init, why not
> >> model TBCLK in clock tree even on DA850?
> > 
> > 
> > TBCLK enabling should done from platform specific way. In DA850 it is done at
> > CFGCHIP1 register. Unfortunately Davinci clock frame work will support only
> > clock nodes inside PLLC and PSC modules. Handling of CFGCHP1 require
> 
> That's true at the moment, but that can be fixed.

I will check.

> 
> > modifications in clock frame work.
> > 
> > Hence handling it as part of initialization.
> 
> I am curious as to how this clock is handled in am335x. I searched for
> tbclk in arch/arm/ of linux-next but could not find any references.
> Where should I be looking?

Patch is submitted. This patch is not in Paul's tree.

[PATCH v2] ARM: AM33XX: clk: Add clock node for EHRPWM TBCLK
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2127581/

Paul,
Can you accept the above patch.

Thanks
Avinash

> 
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>