[GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: keystone: device tree updates for 3.14

[Kevin Hilman]

Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:

> Kevin,
>
> On Thursday 19 December 2013 06:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>>
>>> Please pull below keystone device tree updates for 3.14
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Santosh
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>>
>>>   Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux-keystone.git tags/keystone-dts
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 732079567da4942b7b4929deff8f236926d0b3eb:
>>>
>>>   ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings (2013-12-12 20:29:17 -0500)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Keystone DTS updates for 3.14
>>>
>>> - ddr3 pll clock node typo fixup.
>>> - EVM specific clock setting with board k2hk-evm.dts.
>>> - GIC node updates for missing virtualisation info.
>>> - Adding USB dwc3 and phy nodes.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Murali Karicheri (3):
>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add a k2hk-evm specific dts file
>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: fix typo in the ddr3 pllclk node name
>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add paclk divider clock node
>>>
>>> Santosh Shilimkar (2):
>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add the GICV and GICH address space
>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add guestos maintenance interrupt
>>>
>>> WingMan Kwok (2):
>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb phy devicetree bindings
>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings
>> 
>> I'm not willing to pull these new bindings.
>> 
>> These new bindings don't have an ack from DT maintainers, and from a
>> quick scan of the archives, don't appear to have ever been posted to the
>> DT list.  If they had been posted to the DT list, and hadn't had a
>> response after 2 weeks, it would've been OK for you to queue them up for
>> us, but as it stands they haven't even been posted for the attention of
>> the DT maintainers.  Please remedy that.  Thanks.
>> 
> Not sure if you got confused because of the subject line on couple
> of patches. There are no new dt bindings in $subject pull request.
> Its all just updating the machine dts files for existing bindings.
> And hence explicitly not sent for device tree list.
>
> I have some more dt patches which adds new bindings which has been
> getting reviewed with dt folks. And since they are not yet acked,
> i haven't included them in the series.
>
> Can you please check one more time and let me know if I am missing
> something ?

It was the creation of new files in Documentation/devicetree/bindings
that I saw with no review/ack etc. that I was referring to.  Having a
closer look, I see they're just adding documentation for SoC specific
parts of existing bindings, so we can merge those.

Pulled into next/dt.

Thanks,

Kevin