[GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: keystone: device tree updates for 3.14

[Santosh Shilimkar]

Kevin,

On Thursday 19 December 2013 06:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:
> 
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> Please pull below keystone device tree updates for 3.14
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santosh
>>
>> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>
>>   Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux-keystone.git tags/keystone-dts
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 732079567da4942b7b4929deff8f236926d0b3eb:
>>
>>   ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings (2013-12-12 20:29:17 -0500)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Keystone DTS updates for 3.14
>>
>> - ddr3 pll clock node typo fixup.
>> - EVM specific clock setting with board k2hk-evm.dts.
>> - GIC node updates for missing virtualisation info.
>> - Adding USB dwc3 and phy nodes.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Murali Karicheri (3):
>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add a k2hk-evm specific dts file
>>       ARM: keystone: dts: fix typo in the ddr3 pllclk node name
>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add paclk divider clock node
>>
>> Santosh Shilimkar (2):
>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add the GICV and GICH address space
>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add guestos maintenance interrupt
>>
>> WingMan Kwok (2):
>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb phy devicetree bindings
>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings
> 
> I'm not willing to pull these new bindings.
> 
> These new bindings don't have an ack from DT maintainers, and from a
> quick scan of the archives, don't appear to have ever been posted to the
> DT list.  If they had been posted to the DT list, and hadn't had a
> response after 2 weeks, it would've been OK for you to queue them up for
> us, but as it stands they haven't even been posted for the attention of
> the DT maintainers.  Please remedy that.  Thanks.
> 
Not sure if you got confused because of the subject line on couple
of patches. There are no new dt bindings in $subject pull request.
Its all just updating the machine dts files for existing bindings.
And hence explicitly not sent for device tree list.

I have some more dt patches which adds new bindings which has been
getting reviewed with dt folks. And since they are not yet acked,
i haven't included them in the series.

Can you please check one more time and let me know if I am missing
something ?

Regards,
Santosh