[GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com> wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 22:54, Olof Johansson :
>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>>
>>> This is the big move of AT91 to Common Clock Framework for 3.14. I
>>> collected
>>> all the material as a "cleanup" topic so that the CCF can be considered
>>> as a
>>> base for all our AT91 patches for 3.14.
>>> I prefer to have the sama5d3 use of AT91 CCF included into this
>>> pull-request
>>> so that it can be read as an example and clearly states that it has been
>>> tested
>>> in real life.
>>> We agreed with Mike to send this work upstream through arm-soc so that we
>>> will
>>> be able to stack other patches for 3.14 on top of that work without
>>> having to
>>> deal with conflicts.
>>>
>>> For merging with the "fixes" pull-request that I sent earlier today, I
>>> also
>>> uploaded a little branch for reference:
>>> at91-3.14-next_fixes_cleanup_dt-resolution.
>>> In two words, the clock section of the arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c file
>>> has to be deleted.
>>>
>>> Do not hesitate to ask questions about this material.
>>>
>>> Thanks, best regards,
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>>
>>>    Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>    git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to b46e837d8ef1f3c777bbf9513e2cdb5d87d6c374:
>>>
>>>    ARM: at91/dt: remove old clk material (2013-12-02 15:31:29 +0100)
>>
>>
>> Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. use this branch as base for your
>> future at91 branches if you need it to avoid conflicts, please.
>
>
> Yes, sure. I still have to synchronize with Uwe as he is building a series
> for removing timex.h that may conflict with these modifications.
>
>
>> (I named it at91/sama5-ccf in our tree)
>
>
> Well, it seems that the at91/sama5-ccf is not aligned with
> next/cleanup as of today (94c5216ee93b)
>
> Did I miss something?

Seems that I pulled it into for-next instead of next/cleanup. Thanks
for catching that.


-Olof