[GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 04/12/2013 22:54, Olof Johansson :
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com> wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> This is the big move of AT91 to Common Clock Framework for 3.14. I collected
>> all the material as a "cleanup" topic so that the CCF can be considered as a
>> base for all our AT91 patches for 3.14.
>> I prefer to have the sama5d3 use of AT91 CCF included into this pull-request
>> so that it can be read as an example and clearly states that it has been tested
>> in real life.
>> We agreed with Mike to send this work upstream through arm-soc so that we will
>> be able to stack other patches for 3.14 on top of that work without having to
>> deal with conflicts.
>>
>> For merging with the "fixes" pull-request that I sent earlier today, I also
>> uploaded a little branch for reference:
>> at91-3.14-next_fixes_cleanup_dt-resolution.
>> In two words, the clock section of the arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c file
>> has to be deleted.
>>
>> Do not hesitate to ask questions about this material.
>>
>> Thanks, best regards,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>
>>    Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>    git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to b46e837d8ef1f3c777bbf9513e2cdb5d87d6c374:
>>
>>    ARM: at91/dt: remove old clk material (2013-12-02 15:31:29 +0100)
>
> Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. use this branch as base for your
> future at91 branches if you need it to avoid conflicts, please.

Yes, sure. I still have to synchronize with Uwe as he is building a 
series for removing timex.h that may conflict with these modifications.

> (I named it at91/sama5-ccf in our tree)

Well, it seems that the at91/sama5-ccf is not aligned with
next/cleanup as of today (94c5216ee93b)

Did I miss something?

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre