[PATCH v3 0/8] i2c: at91: cleanup and dt support
Wolfram Sang
w.sang at pengutronix.de
Wed Sep 12 06:16:07 EDT 2012
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 08:42 AM, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com :
> > From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This set of patches is based on Nikolaus at91_i2c driver.
> >
> > Changes:
> > v3:
> > - only put multi-drive lines in the if...else statement (suggested
> > by Warner Losh)
>
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> As said by Ludovic, this series goes on top of Nikolaus' one.
> My Acked-by is already set on this one, so I think that I have nothing
> more to do ;-)
>
> BTW, in case you need help to sort all this, do not hesitate to contact
> us... we can setup a git tree for this...
I think I am fine. Patches look good. I wondered a bit about first
removing the old driver, then adding the new one with regard to
bisectability. But as the old driver depends on BROKEN, I think this is
OK to do.
One thing I'd like to make, though. I'd like to squash the following
patches into one:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver
i2c: at91: use managed resources
i2c: at91: add warning about transmission issues for some devices
i2c: at91: use an id table for SoC dependent parameters
It is especially the last patch I am mostly interested in. The id_table
approach is what I like, while the original id_entry mechanism looks
fishy. I'd was good for reviewing to have the patches split like this;
yet for hitting mainline, I'd prefer to have the driver proper on first
occasion. I already did the squashing in a test-branch and the result
looks good to me.
Nikolaus, Ludovic: Are you fine with this?
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120912/f3eb127a/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list