pxa:spitz_pm.c: commit b6eede11 breaks spitz resume under certain conditions.

[Marko Katić]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Marko Katić <dromede at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Almost there, but I guess we could do this better and less confusing by having
>> another array, e.g. tosa_gpio18_config[], which is tosa specific, and only
>> initialize that MFP setting in the tosa path.
>>
>>>
>>> I also looked at the original sharp kernel sources.
>>> Only tosa used the RDY signal for it's tc6393tx chip, other machines simply
>>> configured gpio18 as output in their suspend routines.
>
>
> Actually, tosa doesn't use sharpsl_pm. Tosa uses the pda-power framework.
> I said that only tosa uses the RDY signal to point out that we
> probably don't need
> the mfp-config line in postsuspend. That being said, i still think
> that the array ordering
> fix is adequate. Maybe later we may remove the mfp-config line from
> postsuspend when
> we're absolutely sure it isn't necessary for devices that use spitz_pm.c.

So Eric what do you think, is the simple gpio array reordering patch
an adequate fix for this bug?