[PATCH 1/1] pinctrl/at91: fix compatible order

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 14:33 Mon 15 Oct     , Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, ludovic.desroches
> <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com> wrote:
> > Le 10/12/2012 11:23 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
> >
> >> the sam9x5 is new version of the rm9200 not the invert
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c |    2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> index 9c0fe11..bdb152b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> @@ -1331,8 +1331,8 @@ static void __devinit at91_gpio_probe_fixup(void)
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
> >> -       { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = &at91rm9200_ops
> >> },
> >>         { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio", .data = &at91sam9x5_ops,
> >> },
> >> +       { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = &at91rm9200_ops
> >> },
> >>         { /* sentinel */ }
> >>   };
> >>
> >
> > Do it also for at91_pinctrl_of_match[], there is the same issue.
> 
> Shall I apply this patch to my at91 branch or will it be updated to
> cover both cases?
the one in your tree is ok

Best Regards,
J.