[PATCH] cpuidle: add Calxeda SOC idle support

Rafael J. Wysocki rjw at sisk.pl
Sat Nov 24 18:32:46 EST 2012


On Saturday, November 24, 2012 03:21:49 PM Olof Johansson wrote:
> Rafael,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Monday, November 12, 2012 10:00:07 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> >> >
> >> > Add support for core powergating on Calxeda platforms. Initially, this
> >> > supports ECX-1000 (highbank), but support will be added for ECX-2000
> >> > later.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> >> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown at intel.com>
> >> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at sisk.pl>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >>
> >> > It's not really clear where we want ARM cpuidle drivers. We're moving
> >> > everything else out of arch/arm, and my understanding is Len doesn't want
> >> > them in drivers/idle. It seems kind of silly to me to have the framework
> >> > and drivers in 2 places. I've put this in drivers/cpuidle, but it doesn't
> >> > make any difference to me.
> >>
> >> Fine with me. I just don't want in in arch/arm because I'm guessing this will
> >> be shared with arm64, which in turn shares idle (and other) drivers with various
> >> powerpc, mips and x86 socs.
> >
> > Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next as v3.8 material.
> 
> We already have it in arm-soc. Since there's no maintainer listed for
> the directory, it didn't seem like there were any better merge paths.

Cool, I'll drop it then.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list