[PATCH 6/9] usb: chipidea: add PTW and PTS handling

[Michael Grzeschik]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:34:23PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Michael Grzeschik <mgr at pengutronix.de> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:45:39PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de> writes:
> >> 
> >> > This patch makes it possible to configure the PTW and PTS bits inside
> >> > the portsc register for host and device mode before the driver starts
> >> > and the phy can be addressed as hardware implementation is designed.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h        |    3 +++
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h          |    2 ++
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c |    1 +
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c        |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c        |    4 +++
> >> >  include/linux/usb/chipidea.h       |    9 +++++++
> >> >  6 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h b/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
> >> > index 4b6ae3e..3cded5f 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
> >> > @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
> >> >  #define PORTSC_SUSP           BIT(7)
> >> >  #define PORTSC_HSP            BIT(9)
> >> >  #define PORTSC_PTC            (0x0FUL << 16)
> >> > +#define PORTSC_PTS            (BIT(31) | BIT(30))
> >> > +#define PORTSC_PTW            BIT(28)
> >> > +#define PORTSC_STS            BIT(29)
> >> 
> >> Hm, my spec says these are actually in DEVLC register and only have this
> >> meaning in device mode. And in portsc these bits fall in device address
> >> bitfield. Can you refer me to your spec?
> >
> > You can find it here:
> > http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/iMX53RM.pdf?fpsp=1
> > Page 4947
> 
> Oh, but see, the offset is 0x184, which in chipidea spec (the version
> that I have) corresponds to DEVLC and not PORTSC. So in this driver's
> terminology it's DEVLC too, at least currently.
> 
> So have you tested this code and did it make any difference?

Yes, i have tested this code with MX25, MX28, MX35 and MX53. In every
SoCs Datasheet the PORTSC register is defined on PORTBASE+0x184. Without
this proper configuration its not possible to communicate with the PHY.

> > We as well do have the original documentation from Synopsys in which there
> > there is an DEVLC register in the index, but nowhere else in the Datasheet.
> 
> Maybe it's a leftover from the old terminology, which would explain the
> confusion.

ACK

> > June 2011 - Doc.Rev. 2.40a
> > USB 2.0 High Speed Atlantic Controller
> Yes, mine is from 2009.

Probably worth to get updatet.

Michael
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |