[PATCH 6/9] usb: chipidea: add PTW and PTS handling
Alexander Shishkin
alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 16 08:34:23 EST 2012
Michael Grzeschik <mgr at pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:45:39PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de> writes:
>>
>> > This patch makes it possible to configure the PTW and PTS bits inside
>> > the portsc register for host and device mode before the driver starts
>> > and the phy can be addressed as hardware implementation is designed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h | 3 +++
>> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h | 2 ++
>> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c | 1 +
>> > drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c | 4 +++
>> > include/linux/usb/chipidea.h | 9 +++++++
>> > 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h b/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
>> > index 4b6ae3e..3cded5f 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/bits.h
>> > @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
>> > #define PORTSC_SUSP BIT(7)
>> > #define PORTSC_HSP BIT(9)
>> > #define PORTSC_PTC (0x0FUL << 16)
>> > +#define PORTSC_PTS (BIT(31) | BIT(30))
>> > +#define PORTSC_PTW BIT(28)
>> > +#define PORTSC_STS BIT(29)
>>
>> Hm, my spec says these are actually in DEVLC register and only have this
>> meaning in device mode. And in portsc these bits fall in device address
>> bitfield. Can you refer me to your spec?
>
> You can find it here:
> http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/iMX53RM.pdf?fpsp=1
> Page 4947
Oh, but see, the offset is 0x184, which in chipidea spec (the version
that I have) corresponds to DEVLC and not PORTSC. So in this driver's
terminology it's DEVLC too, at least currently.
So have you tested this code and did it make any difference?
> We as well do have the original documentation from Synopsys in which there
> there is an DEVLC register in the index, but nowhere else in the Datasheet.
Maybe it's a leftover from the old terminology, which would explain the
confusion.
> June 2011 - Doc.Rev. 2.40a
> USB 2.0 High Speed Atlantic Controller
Yes, mine is from 2009.
Regards,
--
Alex
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list