[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

Mohammed, Afzal afzal at ti.com
Wed Jun 13 07:58:33 EDT 2012

Hi Tony,

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:24:45, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
> > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
> > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
> > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.
> Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's
> a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with
> the timings.
> Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for
> tusb6010?

Not as of now, let me try to find out.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list