[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings
tony at atomide.com
Wed Jun 13 07:54:45 EDT 2012
* Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [120613 04:36]:
> * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal at ti.com> [120612 22:00]:
> > Hi Jon,
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:06:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> > > Should you at least warn, if you are going to over-write a value?
> > Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony
> > prefers that way I will add.
> If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
> test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
> then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
> NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.
Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's
a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with
Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for
More information about the linux-arm-kernel