[PATCH 21/25] OMAP4: PM: Add MPUSS power domain OSWR support

Jean Pihet jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
Tue Sep 13 03:39:05 EDT 2011


Hi Santosh,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 September 2011 12:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> This patch adds the MPUSS OSWR (Open Switch Retention) support. The MPUSS
>>> OSWR configuration is as below.
>>>        - CPUx L1 and logic lost, MPUSS logic lost, L2 memory is retained
>>>
>>> OMAP4460 onwards, MPUSS power domain doesn't support OFF state any more
>>> anymore just like CORE power domain. The deepest state supported is OSWR.
>>> On OMAP4430 secure devices too, MPUSS off mode can't be used because of
>>> a bug which alters Ducati and Tesla states. Hence MPUSS off mode as an
>>> independent state isn't supported on OMAP44XX devices.
>>>
>>> Ofcourse when MPUSS power domain transitions to OSWR along
>>> with device off mode, it eventually hits off state since memory
>>> contents are lost.
>>>
>>> Hence the MPUSS off mode independent state is not attempted without
>>> device off mode. All the necessary infrastructure code for MPUSS
>>> off mode is in place as part of this series.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman<khilman at ti.com>
>>
>> Compile failure for the !CONFIG_PM case:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -70,11 +71,18 @@ static inline int omap4_mpuss_init(void)
>>>  {
>>>        return 0;
>>>  }
>>> -
>>> +static inline u32 omap4_mpuss_read_prev_context_state(void)
>>> +{
>>> +       return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> added here
>>
>>>  static inline int omap4_finish_suspend(unsigned long cpu_state)
>>>  {}
This one should return 0, as I already pointed out in the comments for [14/25].

Regards,
Jean

>>>  static inline void omap4_cpu_resume(void)
>>>  {}
>>> +static inline u32 omap4_mpuss_read_prev_context_state(void)
>>> +{
>>> +       return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> same thing added here
>>
> I noticed this yesterday and was planning to send a note on this
> patch. :(
> Have removed this already in the updated patches.
> Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> Regards
> Santosh
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list