[PATCH 01/12] ARM: clean up idle handlers
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Tue Oct 25 03:56:20 EDT 2011
* Nicolas Pitre <nico at fluxnic.net> [111024 12:16]:
> Let's factor out the need_resched() check instead of having it duplicated
> in every pm_idle implementations to avoid inconsistencies (omap2_pm_idle
> was missing it already).
>
> The forceful re-enablement of IRQs after pm_idle has returned can go.
> The warning certainly doesn't trigger for existing users. Similar for
> the redundant local_irq_disable() call in the OMAP implementations.
Looks good to me.
> And finally move the comment explaining the reason for the turning off
> of IRQs to a more proper location.
One minor comment on that comment below.
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
...
> - * This will eventually be removed - pm_idle
> - * functions should always return with IRQs
> - * enabled.
> + * pm_idle functions should always
> + * return with IRQs enabled.
> */
> WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
> + } else
> local_irq_enable();
> - }
Any reason to use "should always return" instead of "must always return
with IRQs enabled"?
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list