Warning at kernel/mutex.c
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Wed Oct 19 02:46:03 EDT 2011
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:45:51PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> 2011/10/18 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>:
>
> >> static LIST_HEAD(clocks);
> >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(clocks_mutex);
> >> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clock_lock);
> > If clocks_mutex is unused now, please remove it. If it's not unused you
> > probably introduced a problem with your patch.
>
> clocks_mutex is still used in clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent.
>
> Should it be converted to spinlocks too?
>
The mutex currently used protects two things: The clock tree and the
clock registers. If we use a mutex for the parent/rate functions and
a spinlock for enable/disable we must make sure that both function sets
do not access the same registers. I *think* this is the case on all
i.MX, but I haven't really checked this.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list