[PATCH v6 0/2] Add device tree support for i.mx51/53 boards

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:18:46PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Shawn,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:42:15AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > Changes since v5:
> > >  * Retrieve fixed clock frequency from device tree
> > > 
> > > Changes since v4:
> > >  * Rebase onto imx-features branch
> > >  * Have devices in soc dtsi as "disabled" and explicitly enable the
> > >    ones in board dts as "okay"
> > >  * Utilize of_irq_init() infrastructure added by Rob Herring recently
> > > 
> > > Shawn Guo (2):
> > >       arm/mx5: add device tree support for imx53 boards
> > >       arm/mx5: add device tree support for imx51 babbage
> > 
> > You sent this patches to Arnd but without saying what he should do with
> > them. Shall I queue them up or does Arnd handle them? Same with the
> > include cleanup series.
> 
> I think you should - the arm-soc tree is there to act as an integration
> tree for the various SoC maintainers.  Patches for SoCs where there's
> an active maintainer should still be handled by the SoC maintainer (and
> either applied to their git tree or forwarded upstream) unless there is
> agreement to do otherwise.
> 
I agree on this point.  But for imx6 support, I expect I can send pull
request directly to Arnd, as I sent a patch to add myself as imx6
maintainer a couple of weeks back and have not seen any objection there.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn