[PATCH v2] gpio/samsung: Complain loudly if we don't know the SoC
Kukjin Kim
kgene.kim at samsung.com
Mon Oct 17 20:08:55 EDT 2011
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> If we don't know the SoC type then we won't add any chips which is rather
> unfortunate as neither GPIO nor pinmux APIs will work, breaking lots of
> different subsystems. Logging at least provides a hint to the user as to
> what's gone wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index 479edc3..8662518 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -2486,6 +2486,9 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
> s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XA, 0,
> IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS);
> s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XB,
> IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS, IRQ_GPIO2_NR_GROUPS);
> #endif
> + } else {
> + WARN(1, "Unknown SoC in gpio-samsung, no GPIOs added\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.6.3
Looks ok to me, applied.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list