[PATCH] OMAP2+: clock: use clock's recalc in DPLL handling
Paul Walmsley
paul at pwsan.com
Fri Oct 7 03:07:56 EDT 2011
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Not all DPLLs are identical; some require special consideration such as
> OMAP4's ABE DPLL, which can have an additional 4x multiplier added to
> it's clock rate based on programming the REGM4XEN bit in it's CLKMODE
> register.
>
> Unfortunately the clock framework makes a few assumptions that all DPLLs
> can have their rates calculated the same way which has led to incorrect
> rates for OMAP4's DPLL_ABE in some cases. This patch fixes the same by
> replacing explicit calls to omap2_dpll_get_rate with clk->recalc if
> .recalc is populated for a clock. If .recalc is NULL then fall back to
> omap2_dpll_get_rate.
>
> Reported-by: Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at ti.com>
I've merged this patch with Jon's "ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: use DPLLs recalc
function instead of omap2_get_dpll_rate" patch, which does almost exactly
the same thing, just without the conditionals on clk->recalc. Updated
patch below. Please let me know if you think I should change anything
about the changelog.
- Paul
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:53:01 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: use DPLLs recalc function instead of
omap2_get_dpll_rate
This is a continuation of Mike Turquette's patch "OMAP3+: use
DPLL's round_rate when setting rate".
omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate() and omap3_noncore_dpll_enable() call
omap2_get_dpll_rate() explicitly. It may be necessary for some
DPLLs to use a different function and so use the DPLLs recalc()
function pointer instead.
An example is the DPLL_ABE on OMAP4 which can have a 4X multiplier
in addition to the usual MN multipler and dividers and therefore
uses a different round_rate and recalc function.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette at ti.com>
Cc: Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez at ti.com>
[paul at pwsan.com: merged this patch with Mike's "use clock's recalc in DPLL
handling" patch; also reported by Misael]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
index 73a1595..fc56745 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_enable(struct clk *clk)
* propagating?
*/
if (!r)
- clk->rate = omap2_get_dpll_rate(clk);
+ clk->rate = (clk->recalc) ? clk->recalc(clk) :
+ omap2_get_dpll_rate(clk);
return r;
}
@@ -424,6 +425,7 @@ void omap3_noncore_dpll_disable(struct clk *clk)
int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
{
struct clk *new_parent = NULL;
+ unsigned long hw_rate;
u16 freqsel = 0;
struct dpll_data *dd;
int ret;
@@ -435,7 +437,8 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
if (!dd)
return -EINVAL;
- if (rate == omap2_get_dpll_rate(clk))
+ hw_rate = (clk->recalc) ? clk->recalc(clk) : omap2_get_dpll_rate(clk);
+ if (rate == hw_rate)
return 0;
/*
--
1.7.6.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list