[PATCH 26/30] ARM: omap: add board autoselection
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Mon Oct 3 05:11:52 EDT 2011
On Monday 03 October 2011 10:58:23 Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > +config MACH_OMAP_AUTO_BOARD
> > + def_bool y
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP2_TUSB6010
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_H4
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_APOLLON
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_APOLLON
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_2430SDP
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3_BEAGLE
> > + depends on !MACH_DEVKIT8000
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_LDP
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3530_LV_SOM
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3_TORPEDO
> > + depends on !MACH_OVERO
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3EVM
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3517EVM
> > + depends on !MACH_CRANEBOARD
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3_PANDORA
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP3_TOUCHBOOK
> > + depends on !MACH_NOKIA_N8X0
> > + depends on !MACH_NOKIA_RM680
> > + depends on !MACH_NOKIA_RX51
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_ZOOM2
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_ZOOM3
> > + depends on !MACH_CM_T35
> > + depends on !MACH_CM_T3517
> > + depends on !MACH_IGEP0020
> > + depends on !MACH_IGEP0030
> > + depends on !MACH_SBC3530
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP_3630SDP
> > + depends on !MACH_TI8168EVM
> > + depends on !MACH_OMAP4_PANDA
> Do we need all above 'depends on *' ?
> Even if they get selected for one of the below
> ARCH along with default machine, build should be happy.
> Right ?
I'm not too happy with having to maintain a list for each subarchitecture,
when each one has the same problem. In general, I would really like to have
the flexibility to disable all but any one board, which requires either
maintaining a list like the above, or expressing the same like
config MACH_OMAP_AUTO_BOARD
def_bool y
depends on !MACH_OMAP_BOARD_SELECTED
select MACH_OMAP_GENERIC if ARCH_OMAP2
select MACH_OMAP_3430SDP if ARCH_OMAP3 && !ARCH_OMAP2
select MACH_OMAP_4430SDP if ARCH_OMAP4 && !ARCH_OMAP3 && !ARCH_OMAP2
and adding a 'select MACH_OMAP_BOARD_SELECTED' for each one. Slightly more
to write but perhaps a little less error-prone.
In the long run, I'd hope we can just get rid of these for subarchitectures
that support device tree probing and make the device tree based machine
description unconditional.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list