Build warning in todays linus/master
Jamie Iles
jamie at jamieiles.com
Mon Mar 21 07:50:41 EDT 2011
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:40:52AM -0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> > I'm getting a build warning on todays master build for my V6K platform:
> >
> > CC arch/arm/mm/mmu.o
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function 'create_36bit_mapping':
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:601:10: warning: format '%08llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> > 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:614:10: warning: format '%08llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> > 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:621:10: warning: format '%08llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> > 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function 'create_mapping':
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:662:10: warning: format '%08llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> > 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:670:10: warning: format '%08llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> > 2 has type 'unsigned int'
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:690:10: warning: format '%08lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has
> > type 'unsigned int'
> >
> > Which is introduced by (3a6b16 [ARM: 6675/1: use phys_addr_t instead of
> > unsigned long in conversion code]), because phys_addr_t is a u32
> > (!CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT). I guess a cast to u64 in the printk()'s in
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c would fix these up, is that the right approach?
>
> It looks like one of the LPAE preparation patches has been merged
> (i.e. the one which replaces unsigned long with phys_addr_t) but the
> conversion specifier fixes are not yet in mainline, although they do
> live in -next.
Ahh, I thought I'd seen something like that on the lists before but
obviously couldn't find the right one! Thanks for pointing me at the
right patches though.
Jamie
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list