[PATCH v2] arm: cmpxchg syscall should data abort if page not write
Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Thu Mar 17 13:57:25 EDT 2011
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> >
> >> From: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert at faraday-tech.com>
> >>
> >> If the page to cmpxchg is user mode read only (not write),
> >> we should simulate a data abort first.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert at faraday-tech.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org>
> >
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> remove !pte_young() check
> >>
> >> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> >> index 446aee9..eac7c05 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> >> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
> >> goto bad_access;
> >> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> >> - if (!pte_present(*pte) || !pte_dirty(*pte)) {
> >> + if (!pte_present(*pte) || !pte_write(*pte) || !pte_dirty(*pte)) {
> >> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> >> goto bad_access;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 1.6.3.3
> >>
>
>
> Just beginning to understand the subtleties involved, so please
> correct me if I'm wrong.
> Wont this patch also fix the problem that was brought up with futexes
> on ARM SMP ?
Nope. The code being fixed here was suptly broken so it needs fixing.
However this code is almost never used, if at all, as it is a fall-back
solution for when all the better alternatives are not available for some
reasons (and I'm still wondering what those reasons are for Po-Yu Chuang
to actually use that code). In practice this bug should have affected
no one.
If you have SMP then this code is definitively not what you should be
using.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list