[PATCH 2/2] ARM: mx5/mx53_evk: Remove unneeded gpio_set_value call
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Wed Mar 16 04:33:26 EDT 2011
[added some people to Cc:]
Hello Julia,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:19:53AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:41:37AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > I tried the following
> > >
> > > @@
> > > expression E1,E2;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > gpio_direction_output(E1,E2);
> > > ...
> > > - gpio_set_value(E1,E2);
> > >
> > > and found occurrences in 15 files. In some cases there seems to be some
> > > delay before the call to gpio_set_value. Does that have any impacton
> > > whether it is needed?
> > gpio_direction_output(E1,E2) implies gpio_set_value(E1,E2), so unless
> > there is a gpio_set_value(E1,!E2) before gpio_set_value(E1,E2) is a
> > noop.
> >
> > I still don't know how to work with coccinelle, so if you point me to a
> > concrete location I can be more specific.
>
> OK. I have changed the semantic patch to the following:
>
> @@
> expression E1,E2,E3;
> @@
>
> gpio_direction_output(E1,E2);
> ... when != gpio_set_value(E1,E3)
> - gpio_set_value(E1,E2);
>
> Now it doesn't do all the cases where there is an earlier set ofr some
> other value. The patch I obtain is below. This only concerns 5 files.
> I haven't checked the result at all.
Thanks. So here comes the check.
> diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c 2011-02-19 08:28:51.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c 2011-03-15 11:17:03.000000000 +0100
> @@ -218,7 +218,6 @@ static inline void babbage_usbhub_reset(
>
> /* USB HUB RESET - De-assert USB HUB RESET_N */
> msleep(1);
> - gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 0);
> msleep(1);
> gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 1);
> }
This function is a bit confusing:
/* Bring USB hub out of reset */
ret = gpio_request(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, "GPIO1_7");
if (ret) {
...
return;
}
gpio_direction_output(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 0);
/* USB HUB RESET - De-assert USB HUB RESET_N */
msleep(1);
gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 0);
msleep(1);
gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 1);
IMHO the comments are misleading. I'd suggest:
ret = gpio_request_one(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET,
GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_LOW, "USB hub reset#");
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to request gpio for USB hub reset#: %d\n", ret);
return;
}
msleep(2);
gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_USB_HUB_RESET, 1);
Fabio?
> @@ -234,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void babbage_fec_reset(voi
> return;
> }
> gpio_direction_output(BABBAGE_FEC_PHY_RESET, 0);
> - gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_FEC_PHY_RESET, 0);
> msleep(1);
> gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_FEC_PHY_RESET, 1);
> }
should use
gpio_request_one(BABBAGE_FEC_PHY_RESET,
GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_LOW, "fec-phy-reset");
> diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c 2011-03-14 17:19:13.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_evk.c 2011-03-15 11:17:03.000000000 +0100
> @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ static inline void mx53_evk_fec_reset(vo
> return;
> }
> gpio_direction_output(SMD_FEC_PHY_RST, 0);
> - gpio_set_value(SMD_FEC_PHY_RST, 0);
> msleep(1);
> gpio_set_value(SMD_FEC_PHY_RST, 1);
> }
ditto
> diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c 2011-03-14 17:19:13.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c 2011-03-15 11:17:04.000000000 +0100
> @@ -860,7 +860,6 @@ static void __init omap3_evm_init(void)
> omap_mux_init_gpio(61, OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP);
> gpio_request(OMAP3_EVM_EHCI_SELECT, "select EHCI port");
> gpio_direction_output(OMAP3_EVM_EHCI_SELECT, 0);
> - gpio_set_value(OMAP3_EVM_EHCI_SELECT, 0);
>
> /* setup EHCI phy reset config */
> omap_mux_init_gpio(21, OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP);
ditto
> diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c 2011-03-14 17:19:13.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c 2011-03-15 11:17:04.000000000 +0100
> @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static void __init omap4_ehci_init(void)
> }
> gpio_export(GPIO_HUB_POWER, 0);
> gpio_direction_output(GPIO_HUB_POWER, 0);
> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_HUB_POWER, 0);
Should use gpio_request_one, too. And IMHO gpio_export should only be
called after the direction is set (which is an obsolete comment when
gpio_request_one is used).
> /* reset phy+hub */
> ret = gpio_request(GPIO_HUB_NRESET, "hub_nreset");
> @@ -139,7 +138,6 @@ static void __init omap4_ehci_init(void)
> }
> gpio_export(GPIO_HUB_NRESET, 0);
> gpio_direction_output(GPIO_HUB_NRESET, 0);
> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_HUB_NRESET, 0);
> gpio_set_value(GPIO_HUB_NRESET, 1);
>
> usbhs_init(&usbhs_bdata);
ditto
> diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/am300epd.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/am300epd.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/am300epd.c 2010-03-18 09:06:45.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/am300epd.c 2011-03-15 11:17:04.000000000 +0100
> @@ -150,8 +150,6 @@ static int am300_init_gpio_regs(struct b
> gpio_direction_output(i, 0);
>
> /* go into command mode */
> - gpio_set_value(CFG_GPIO_PIN, 1);
> - gpio_set_value(RST_GPIO_PIN, 0);
> msleep(10);
> gpio_set_value(RST_GPIO_PIN, 1);
> msleep(10);
This can probably make use of gpio_request_array.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list