[PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Fix section mismatch from cpufreq init

[Kukjin Kim]

Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> The cpufreq init function is referenced from the driver structure and
> we don't appear to have annotations which allow us to mark that it'll
> never be called after system init, causing the linker consistency
> infrastructure to complain. Just remove the __init annotation to avoid
> noise from the build.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
> index 74c0e83..4375b97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void __init
s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> -static int __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy)
> +static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
> --

Looks ok, applied into s5p-fixes-for-linus for 38 :)
Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.