[RFC PATCHv1 1/2] Export SoC info through sysfs
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin-nonst at stericsson.com
Thu Mar 10 07:56:17 EST 2011
On 03/09/2011 08:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 17:59:20 Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> Common base to export System-on-Chip related informations through sysfs.
>>
>> Creation of a "soc" directory under /sys/devices/system/.
> Why under system?
>
> As far as I can tell, the SOC already exists as a platform device
> under /sys/devices/platform, so just put the data in there.
The aim of this patch is to provide a common interface for SoC vendors
to export some pieces of information.
For now, only the machine name is common in this patch set, but some
other attributes might be common (family name, silicon process...).
Moving to /sys/devices/platform means it will be vendor-specific, so we
loose the gain of having a common ABI. Right?
> There is no point in having the same physical device represented
> as multiple separate instances in sysfs.
>
>> Creation of a common "mach_name" entry to export machine name.
>> Creation of platform-defined SoC information entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime COQUELIN<maxime.coquelin-nonst at stericsson.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/Kconfig | 4 ++
>> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/base/soc.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/sys_soc.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++
> This seems to be missing the documentation file. Every sysfs
> attribute you create must be documented.
>
Ok, I will fix it.
>> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
>> @@ -168,4 +168,8 @@ config SYS_HYPERVISOR
>> bool
>> default n
>>
>> +config SYS_SOC
>> + bool "Export SoC specific informations"
>> + depends on EMBEDDED
>> +
>> endmenu
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED is gone, and did not mean what you intended.
>
> Just make the information unconditionally available in
> the code that manages you SoC.
>
Ok.
>> +void __init register_sys_soc(char *name, struct sys_soc_info *info, int num)
>> +{
>> + int len;
>> +
>> + len = strlen(name);
>> + soc.mach_name = kzalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!soc.mach_name)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + sprintf(soc.mach_name, "%s", name);
>> +
>> + if (sysdev_class_register(&soc.class)) {
>> + kfree(soc.mach_name);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + register_sys_soc_info(info, num);
>> +}
> You do way too much here when all you need is a platform
> device attribute.
>
> Arnd
Thanks for your review,
Maxime
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list