[PATCH 2 14/18] I2C: OMAP1/OMAP2+: create omap I2C functionality flags for each cpu_... test

[Cousson, Benoit]

On 3/9/2011 4:18 PM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 02:31 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
>> Minor comment, Can you use
>> BIT(0) for 1, BIT(1) for 2 ... BIT (8) for 0x100
>
> OK, I agree it will be nicer.  Thanks for the comment.
>
> I guess I can just change this and issue just this guy as try 3 rather
> than sending the whole series mostly unchanged.  In that case, I'll take
> care of Benoit's member re-ordering to match the scripts at the same
> time and issue that guy as try 3 as well.

It is up to Ben, but maybe it will be less confusing to re-send the 
whole series, since you have at least two patches to update.

Maybe, just wait a little bit in case someone else has something to say 
about this series.

Benoit