[patch v3 1/3] arm: introduce cross trigger interface helpers

Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Mon Mar 7 07:04:50 EST 2011


Ming Lei,
Some comments below

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-
> arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
> tom.leiming at gmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:24 PM
> To: linux at arm.linux.org.uk
> Cc: Ming Lei; will.deacon at arm.com; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: [patch v3 1/3] arm: introduce cross trigger interface
> helpers
>
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming at gmail.com>
>
> OMAP4 uses cross trigger interface(CTI) to route
> performance monitor irq to GIC, so introduce cti
> helpers to make access for cti easily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h |  177
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..48f173a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> +/*
> + *  arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h
> + */
In general the file name path doesn't give much and rather
difficult to maintain when file are moved around. You
can drop above path and may be add some text if you like.

> +#ifndef __ASMARM_CTI_H
> +#define __ASMARM_CTI_H
> +
> +#include	<asm/io.h>
> +
> +/*The registers' definition is from section 3.2 of
> + * 	Embedded Cross Trigger Revision: r0p0
> + **/
Watch out for commenting style.

> +#define		CTICONTROL		0x000
> +#define		CTISTATUS		0x004
> +#define		CTILOCK			0x008
> +#define		CTIPROTECTION		0x00C
> +#define		CTIINTACK		0x010
> +#define		CTIAPPSET		0x014
> +#define		CTIAPPCLEAR		0x018
> +#define		CTIAPPPULSE		0x01c
> +#define		CTIINEN			0x020
> +#define		CTIOUTEN		0x0A0
> +#define		CTITRIGINSTATUS		0x130
> +#define		CTITRIGOUTSTATUS	0x134
> +#define		CTICHINSTATUS		0x138
> +#define		CTICHOUTSTATUS		0x13c
> +#define		CTIPERIPHID0		0xFE0
> +#define		CTIPERIPHID1		0xFE4
> +#define		CTIPERIPHID2		0xFE8
> +#define		CTIPERIPHID3		0xFEC
> +#define		CTIPCELLID0		0xFF0
> +#define		CTIPCELLID1		0xFF4
> +#define		CTIPCELLID2		0xFF8
> +#define		CTIPCELLID3		0xFFC
> +
> +/*The two below are from section 3.6.4 of
> + * 	CoreSight v1.0 Architecture Specification
> + **/

Ditto

> +#define		LOCKACCESS		0xFB0
> +#define		LOCKSTATUS		0xFB4
> +
> +/**
> + * struct cti - cross trigger interface struct
> + * @base: mapped virtual address for the cti base
> + * @irq: irq number for the cti
> + * @trig_out_for_irq: triger out number which will cause
> + * 	the @irq happen
> + *
> + * cti struct used to operate cti registers.
> + */
> +struct cti {
> +	void *base;
> +	int irq;
> +	int trig_out_for_irq;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_init - initialize the cti instance
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + * @base: mapped virtual address for the cti base
> + * @irq: irq number for the cti
> + * @trig_out: triger out number which will cause
> + * 	the @irq happen
> + *
> + * called by machine code to pass the board dependent
> + * @base, @irq and @trig_out to cti.
> + */
> +static inline void cti_init(struct cti *cti,
> +	void *base, int irq, int trig_out)
> +{
> +	cti->base = base;
> +	cti->irq  = irq;
> +	cti->trig_out_for_irq = trig_out;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_map_trigger - use the @chan to map @trig_in to @trig_out
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + * @trig_in: trigger in number
> + * @trig_out: trigger out number
> + * @channel: channel number
> + *
> + * This function maps one trigger in of @trig_in to one trigger
> + * out of @trig_out using the channel @chan.
> + */
> +static inline void cti_map_trigger(struct cti *cti,
> +	int trig_in, int trig_out, int chan)
> +{
> +	void *base = cti->base;

s/ void *base / void __iomem *base
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(base + CTIINEN + trig_in * 4);
> +	val |= 1 << chan;
> +	__raw_writel(val, base + CTIINEN + trig_in * 4);
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(base + CTIOUTEN + trig_out * 4);
> +	val |= 1 << chan;
> +	__raw_writel(val, base + CTIOUTEN + trig_out * 4);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_enable - enable the cti module
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + *
> + * enable the cti module
> + */
> +static inline void cti_enable(struct cti *cti)
> +{
> +	__raw_writel(0x1, cti->base);
Even though base address points to CTICONTROL you
should add that.
__raw_writel(0x1, cti->base + CTICONTROL);

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_disable - disable the cti module
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + *
> + * enable the cti module
> + */
> +static inline void cti_disable(struct cti *cti)
> +{
> +	__raw_writel(0, cti->base);
__raw_writel(0x0, cti->base + CTICONTROL);


> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_irq_ack - clear the cti irq
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + *
> + * clear the cti irq
> + */
> +static inline void cti_irq_ack(struct cti *cti)
> +{
> +	void *base = cti->base;
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(base + CTIINTACK);
> +	val |= 1 << cti->trig_out_for_irq;
You could use
BIT(cti->trig_out_for_irq)

> +	__raw_writel(val, base + CTIINTACK);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_unlock - unlock cti module
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + *
> + * unlock the cti module, or else any writes to the cti
> + * module is not allowed.
> + */
> +static inline void cti_unlock(struct cti *cti)
> +{
> +	void *base = cti->base;


s/ void *base / void __iomem *base

> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(base + LOCKSTATUS);
> +
> +	if (val & 1) {
> +		val = 0xC5ACCE55;

Define a macro for "0xC5ACCE55" with some comments
please.
> +		__raw_writel(val, base + LOCKACCESS);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cti_lock - lock cti module
> + * @cti: cti instance
> + *
> + * lock the cti module, so any writes to the cti
> + * module will be not allowed.
> + */
> +static inline void cti_lock(struct cti *cti)
> +{
> +	void *base = cti->base;
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	val = __raw_readl(base + LOCKSTATUS);
> +
> +	if (!(val & 1)) {
> +		val = ~0xC5ACCE55;

Ditto
> +		__raw_writel(val, base + LOCKACCESS);
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif
> --
> 1.7.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list