[PATCH] gpio: ep93xx: move driver to drivers/gpio

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 7:45 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:24 AM, H Hartley Sweeten
>> gpio: Samsung: make Kconfig options def_bool
>>
>> The Samsung GPIO drivers are always built-in when the relevant
>> platform is selected.  Change the Kconfig symbol to def_bool y
>> dependant on the platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> index 18c0b31..2e3cd11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> @@ -87,32 +87,20 @@ config GPIO_IT8761E
>>          Say yes here to support GPIO functionality of IT8761E super I/O chip.
>>
>>  config GPIO_EXYNOS4
>> -       bool "Samsung Exynos4 GPIO library support"
>> -       default y
>> -       depends on ARM && CPU_EXYNOS4210
>> -       help
>> -         Say yes here to support Samsung Exynos4 series SoCs GPIO library
>> +       def_bool y
>> +       depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210
>>
>>  config GPIO_PLAT_SAMSUNG
>> -       bool "Samsung SoCs GPIO library support"
>> -       default y
>> -       depends on ARM && SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
>> -       help
>> -         Say yes here to support Samsung SoCs GPIO library
>> +       def_bool y
>> +       depends on SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
>>
>>  config GPIO_S5PC100
>> -       bool "Samsung S5PC100 GPIO library support"
>> -       default y
>> -       depends on ARM && CPU_S5PC100
>> -       help
>> -         Say yes here to support Samsung S5PC100 SoCs GPIO library
>> +       def_bool y
>> +       depends on CPU_S5PC100
>>
>>  config GPIO_S5PV210
>> -       bool "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 GPIO library support"
>> -       default y
>> -       depends on ARM && CPU_S5PV210
>> -       help
>> -         Say yes here to support Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoCs GPIO library
>> +       def_bool y
>> +       depends on CPU_S5PV210
>>
>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>

Kyungmin,

Thanks.  I'll repost this as a proper patch in a new email.

Regards,
Hartley