[PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PCM049: remove vusim regulator
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Fri Jul 15 04:20:12 EDT 2011
* Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> [110715 00:53]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:50:24AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Jan Weitzel <J.Weitzel at phytec.de> [110714 01:34]:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2011, 00:34 -0700 schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> > > > * Jan Weitzel <J.Weitzel at phytec.de> [110713 05:51]:
> > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2011, 16:13 +0400 schrieb Sergei Shtylyov:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have you added that 'i' at the end intentionally?
> > > > > >
> > > > > Thank you. It was a tribute to vim.
> > > >
> > > > :i)
> > > >
> > > > I'll fold the fixed patch into your original patch. Will also
> > > > keep the new board files in testing-board because of the code
> > > > coalescing and device tree conversion effort.
> > >
> > > So there is no way to get the board mainline yet?
> >
> > Well we can add it even before device tree support if it makes
> > sense from code coalescing point of view. In this case it would
> > mean creating board-panda-common.c or similar so the code can
> > be shared amongst the panda variants.
> >
> > It seems that some GPIO pins are different and there are some
> > difference in devices connected, but big parts of the code can be
> > shared.
>
> isn't it easier than to just add a few if (machine_is_xxxx()) checks and
> another MACHINE_START() to board-omap4panda.c rather than creating a new
> file, shuffling code around and then adding a new board file ??
That works too if the init_machine does not get too complicated.
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list