Status of arch/arm in linux-next
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Fri Apr 29 20:05:31 EDT 2011
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers
> > > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms
> > > (that need not be a complete driver).
> > Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend.
> > I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan.
> > That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is
> > the way forward.
> > in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ?
> > If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches
> > for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40
> FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git
> Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus
> next merge window.
Thanks. Additional drivers should follow suit.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel