Status of arch/arm in linux-next
davej at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 16:15:22 EDT 2011
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers
> > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms
> > (that need not be a complete driver).
> Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend.
> I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan.
> That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is
> the way forward.
> in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ?
> If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches
> for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40
FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git
Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus
next merge window.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel