[PATCH 3/7] ARM: Samsung: Use the correct I2C2 interrupt

[Kyungmin Park]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Jongsun Han <jongsun.han at samsung.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Lothar Waßmann <LW at karo-electronics.de>
>> wrote:
>> > Kyungmin Park writes:
>> >> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>> >>
>> >> Use the correct I2C2 interrupt.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c |    4 ++--
>> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c b/arch/arm/plat-
>> samsung/dev-i2c2.c
>> >> index 07036de..ff4ba69 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
>> >> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ static struct resource s3c_i2c_resource[] = {
>> >>               .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> >>       },
>> >>       [1] = {
>> >> -             .start = IRQ_CAN0,
>> >> -             .end   = IRQ_CAN0,
>> >> +             .start = IRQ_IIC2,
>> >> +             .end   = IRQ_IIC2,
>> >>
>> > Is there any reason for using 'IIC' here to refer to 'I2C'?
>>
>> Historical reason previous s3c24xx series use this name. I don't want
>> to break the s3c24xx series codes.
>> Instead I use the I2C after S5P series. I2C3, I2C4 and so on.
>>
>> If all person who works on s3c24xx and s5p series agree that use the
>> I2C. It can be used.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kyungmin Park
>
> Hi, Kyungmin
> IRQ_CAN0 is also used in arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/irqs.h

Yes it's defined and will be used. but not I2C2
I already check it. at least my manual it's s5pc100 don't have I2C2.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

>
> Best Regards
> Jongsun Han
>
>
>