[PATCH 3/7] ARM: Samsung: Use the correct I2C2 interrupt

[Jongsun Han]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Lothar Waßmann <LW at karo-electronics.de>
> wrote:
> > Kyungmin Park writes:
> >> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Use the correct I2C2 interrupt.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c |    4 ++--
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> index 07036de..ff4ba69 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ static struct resource s3c_i2c_resource[] = {
> >>               .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >>       },
> >>       [1] = {
> >> -             .start = IRQ_CAN0,
> >> -             .end   = IRQ_CAN0,
> >> +             .start = IRQ_IIC2,
> >> +             .end   = IRQ_IIC2,
> >>
> > Is there any reason for using 'IIC' here to refer to 'I2C'?
> 
> Historical reason previous s3c24xx series use this name. I don't want
> to break the s3c24xx series codes.
> Instead I use the I2C after S5P series. I2C3, I2C4 and so on.
> 
> If all person who works on s3c24xx and s5p series agree that use the
> I2C. It can be used.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park

Hi, Kyungmin
IRQ_CAN0 is also used in arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/irqs.h

Best Regards
Jongsun Han