[PATCH v2] AT91: Add flexibity board support
Ryan Mallon
ryan at bluewatersys.com
Tue Sep 14 16:48:07 EDT 2010
On 09/14/2010 05:57 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
> Please see my comments below...
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com> wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 10:18 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>>
>>> +static void __init flexibity_board_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Serial */
>>> + at91_add_device_serial();
>>> + /* USB Host */
>>> + at91_add_device_usbh(&flexibity_usbh_data);
>>> + /* USB Device */
>>> + at91_add_device_udc(&flexibity_udc_data);
>>> + /* SPI */
>>> + at91_add_device_spi(flexibity_spi_devices,
>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(flexibity_spi_devices));
>>> + /* MMC */
>>> + at91_add_device_mmc(0, &flexibity_mmc_data);
>>> + /* LEDs */
>>> + at91_gpio_leds(flexibity_leds, ARRAY_SIZE(flexibity_leds));
>>
>> Can we drop all the comments inside this function please. They don't add
>> any information and they make it harder to read the actual code.
>>
>
> Ryan, thank you for the review. However I would like to keep these
> comments - for some devices, like UDC - it really provides
> clarification. Reading the code is not a problem with proper
> highlighting scheme.
There are already comments above each of the structures so it is clear
what all of these are. IMHO, this commenting is similar to doing:
/* Add 1 to i */
i++;
We don't have this kind of overly verbose commenting in any of the other
ARM variants, it appears to something that is just cut and pasted around
the AT91 boards :-). Syntax highlighting or not, reading one for one
comments on what should be straight forward device registration is annoying.
~Ryan
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list