[PATCH 40/54] ARM: Samsung SoCs: irq_data conversion.

Kukjin Kim kgene.kim at samsung.com
Tue Dec 21 05:03:45 EST 2010


Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:56:03PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> > Hi Lennert,
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> 
> > (Added Mark Brown in Cc)
> >
> > Looks ok to me but there are some comments.
> >
> > Firstly, how about to separate this to regarding S3C24XX(mach-s3c24xx
and
> > plat-s3c24xx), S5P(mach-s5pxxxx and plat-s5p) and plat-samsung?
> > (Actually, already applied S3C64XX changes so that we can drop that in
your
> > patch.)
> >
> > As you know, I already applied some changes which is from Mark Brown in
my
> > tree.
> > You can find that in
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > #for-next
> >
> > So could you please re-work this based on that?
> 
> I've reworked the patch I had in my tree on top of your git tree
> (latest commit "Merge branch 'next-s5p64x0' into for-next"), and came
> up with the three attached patches.  I've incorporated the whitespace
> changes you requested, and changed the struct irq_data * variable
> names from 'd' to 'data' to match Mark's earlier patches.
> 
> Caveat emptor -- uncompiled, and totally untested.
> 
> How's this look?
> 
> Feel free to merge this via your tree -- I'll drop the Samsung patch
> from my tree then.
> 

Hi Lennert :-)

I found your different e-mail in your patch like following.

"From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh at wantstofly.org>"
...
"Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh at secretlab.ca>"

I think, should be used same e-mail address.
Which one do you want to use?...

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list