4 new commits in master

[Pete Batard]

On 2012.04.10 01:05, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I am not so sure what is your preference about
> rebranding, I think the binary distribution (including
> libusb.h, libusb-1.0.pc, dynamic/import library) should
> not be changed to libusbx* for the 1.0.x series, at least
> not for the near future.

That's the plan. We agreed that we wanted to keep the 1.0 branch of 
libusbx as a drop-in replacement for libusb.

> As for solution file etc, that
> does not matter and you can change them within
> the 1.0.x series.

Yes, I'm only talking about rebranding elements that would have no 
impact on the above, and the prefix of the VS project files wouldn't. 
Obviously, these changes are not very high priority.

 > BTW, one place you forgot to change for libusbx branding
 > is here, probably the name should be changed
 > from libusb-1.0 to libusbx
 > 
http://libusbx.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libusbx/libusbx;a=blob_plain;f=libusb-1.0.pc.in;hb=HEAD

I've been wondering about that one. I suppose changing the name would be 
OK, but I'd rather be cautious in case we have some people out there 
doing their own .pc parsing and checking the name.
Anybody sees an issue if we change the Name: field to libusbx-1.0?

The description needs to be updated as well, at least to mention OpenBSD...

Regards,

/Pete