4 new commits in master

[Michael Plante]

Pete Batard wrote:
>> On 2012.04.10 01:05, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> > I am not so sure what is your preference about
>> > rebranding, I think the binary distribution (including
>> > libusb.h, libusb-1.0.pc, dynamic/import library) should
>> > not be changed to libusbx* for the 1.0.x series, at least
>> > not for the near future.
>>
>> That's the plan. We agreed that we wanted to keep the 1.0 branch of
>> libusbx as a drop-in replacement for libusb.
>>
>> > As for solution file etc, that
>> > does not matter and you can change them within
>> > the 1.0.x series.
>>
>> Yes, I'm only talking about rebranding elements that would have no
>> impact on the above, and the prefix of the VS project files wouldn't.
>> Obviously, these changes are not very high priority.


Renaming those files runs the risk of eventually making differencing more
difficult.  If the files' contents change enough, git may or may not match
them up with the libusb version, which will make it more difficult to copy
changes back and forth.  Is there a good reason to rename them?

Regards,
Michael