4 new commits in master

Xiaofan Chen xiaofanc at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 20:12:48 EDT 2012


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
>>> Maybe at one stage we want to change the libusb_ prefix to
>>> libusbx_ (which only impacts the solution file, not the binary
>>> produced), but I'm planning to leav it as is for 1.0.10.
>>
>> I am not so sure what is your preference about
>> rebranding, I think the binary distribution (including
>> libusb.h, libusb-1.0.pc, dynamic/import library)
>
> And the static library.
>
>> should not be changed to libusbx* for the 1.0.x series, at least
>> not for the near future. As for solution file etc, that
>> does not matter and you can change them within
>> the 1.0.x series.

BTW, one place you forgot to change for libusbx branding
is here, probably the name should be changed
from libusb-1.0 to libusbx
http://libusbx.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libusbx/libusbx;a=blob_plain;f=libusb-1.0.pc.in;hb=HEAD

-- 
Xiaofan



More information about the libusbx mailing list