dcbw at redhat.com
Wed Sep 3 16:24:35 EDT 2008
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:15 +0000, Cliff Cai wrote:
> >>> It'll show the data rate as 0 until you transmit or receive some frames,
> >>> because the rate isn't actually known until (a) you've associated to
> >>> something and (b) you've tx/rxed some frames.
> >>> Setting the rate to auto shouldn't fail though, sounds like a bug. But
> >>> this looks like it's fixed in 2.6.27, no error is returned.
> >>> What's the git commit hash of the version of libertas you're using?
> >>> 2.6.26 vanilla?
> >>>> eth1 IEEE 802.11b/g ESSID:""
> >>>> Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:00:00:00:00:00
> >>>> Bit Rate:0 kb/s Tx-Power=18 dBm
> >>>> Retry limit:8 RTS thr=2347 B Fragment thr=2346 B
> >>>> Encryption key:off
> >>>> Power Management:off
> >>>> Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
> >>>> Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
> >>>> Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
> >>>> I'm able to run:
> >>>>>ifconfig eth1 up
> >>>>>iwlist eth1 scan
> >>>> and get the available AP information.
> >>>> also I successfully run
> >>>>>iwconfig eth1 essid myAPname
> >>> Does the AP use any encryption? Does an "iwconfig" show a valid BSSID
> >> It's exactly the encryption problem!
> > Do you mean you've solved your issue? If you're using WEP there are
> > quite a few gotchas, including the key length, the hashing algorithm
> > (hex, passphrase, ascii) and the authentication system (open system or
> > shared key) that you just have to know before trying to connect to a
> > WEP-enabled AP.
> Yes,at last I found an AP without encryption,so I successfully associated with it.
> Everything is good except the bad performance,any suggestion about how to improve it?
> >> One more question,I want to know if there is available firmware support SDIO SPI mode now?
> >> I saw a post said it was not support that time ,how about now?
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libertas-dev/2008-March/001382.html
> > Various parts have had G-SPI support for a while but of course that
> > requires the firmware which people need to get form Marvell. If you've
> > got firmware and the necessary host interface, we could try to give it a
> > shot. But I have to admin I'm not familiar with how the host controller
> > needs to be set up to handle SPI mode. Does it require a specific SDIO
> > controller type, or can most SDIO controllers handle SPI? Does it
> > require changes to the kernel SDIO stack to accommodate SPI? Basically,
> > changes to the actual libertas driver aren't the only thing required
> > here because I'm pretty sure we'd need changes to the host controller
> > drivers and the stack too.
> I have another board which has no SD host,but has a SPI bus.
> AFAIK,Currently the G-SPI driver for Marvell 8686 is non-opensource,
> I won't try it.Now there is a SPI simulated SD host driver in the kernel tree,see /drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
> we've successfully tried it with a SD card,So I think SDIO SPI mode is a way to go,but I can't make it work.
> that's why I ask this question.
Single or dual-stage firmware? We can probably make SDIO SPI mode work
if we try hard enough, but there are some quirks with it.
More information about the libertas-dev