[LEDE-DEV] Ubnt power beam board - back to defaults after reboot

[Jiri Pirko]

Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:48:48AM CEST, gareth41 at orcon.net.nz wrote:
>Hi Jiri
>This is a common problem on XM devices due to new uboot on AirOS >= 5.6.x,
>although I haven't got any XW devices to test but its possibly the same?
>Try downgrading back to AirOS v5.5.11 or less or apply the following patches
>which I can confirm fix the problem on my XM devices.
>
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/1f400189cfbae697b5018
>0bccf876784a3c03423/patches/openwrt/0026-kernel-backport-spi-nor-driver-from
>-4.4.9.patch
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/1f400189cfbae697b5018
>0bccf876784a3c03423/patches/openwrt/0027-kernel-mtd-spi-nor-wait-until-statu
>s-register-writes-are-ready.patch
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/1f400189cfbae697b5018
>0bccf876784a3c03423/patches/openwrt/0028-kernel-mtd-spi-nor-unlock-Winbond-f
>lashs.patch

Ok, will try, thanks. But why these patches are not merged to openwrt master?

Also, it be would be nice to mention this on the wiki.


>
>Cheers,
>
>Gareth
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
>Jiri Pirko
>Sent: Thursday, 20 October 2016 8:29 p.m.
>To: openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org; lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>Subject: [LEDE-DEV] Ubnt power beam board - back to defaults after reboot
>
>Hi.
>
>Trying Ubiquity power beam M5. According to the instructions on openwrt
>wiki, I'm using loco m5 firmware. All looks fine, only configuration is lost
>after every reboot.
>
>Tried:
>openwrt-15.05.1-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-loco-m-xw-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
>openwrt-15.05-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-loco-m-xw-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
>openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-loco-m-xw-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
>lede-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-loco-m-xw-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
>
>All with the same result.
>
>I remember I had some similar problem in past on a different board, and I
>believe that there was and issue on definition of nand size. Not really
>sure.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Jiri
>
>_______________________________________________
>Lede-dev mailing list
>Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>