[LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

[L. D. Pinney]

>From the OP

I wanted to ask folks whether they want me to continue to cross post to these

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:49 AM, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 16/06/2016 09:18, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.
>
> no he did not, he never asked that
>
>
>> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
>>
>
> ok you did not understand the purpose of the thread was.
>
>
>
>> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp
>
> yeah works great everyone is happy that is why they are looking for
> alternatives
>
>
>> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.
>>
>
> ok, 1 nak form someone that missed the point and a pile of folks that
> think its good and welcome that prpl is starting to work in public
> rather than doing back room deals behind closed doors.
>
> </thread>
>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.
>>>
>>> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
>>>
>>> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp
>>>
>>> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to.
>>>>
>>>> the list is  non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why
>>>> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state
>>>> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its
>>>> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in
>>>> creating such code.
>>>>
>>>> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having
>>>> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic.
>>>>
>>>> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to
>>>> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be
>>>> open/transparent" ones.
>>>>
>>>> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ?
>>>>
>>>>         John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we
>>>>> need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to
>>>>> Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list".
>>>>> Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this
>>>>> conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank".
>>>>> Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you!
>>>>>
>>>>> JohnA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>>>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic
>>>>>> behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
>>>>>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
>>>>>>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Lang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
>>>>>>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical
>>>>>>>> development issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> etiquette such as found here :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a
>>>>>>>> corporate conspiracy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Free Software is meant to be free ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s)
>>>>>>>> torques me off every time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz
>>>>>>>> <eschultz at prplfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks
>>>>>>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in
>>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>>> to the prplwrt list at openwrt at lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no
>>>>>>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what
>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>> would prefer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
>>>>>>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org
>>>>>>>>> eschultz at prplfoundation.org
>>>>>>>>> cell: 920-539-0404
>>>>>>>>> skype: ericschultzwi
>>>>>>>>> @EricPrpl
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>
>>>