[LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

[John Crispin]

On 16/06/2016 09:18, L. D. Pinney wrote:
> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.

no he did not, he never asked that


> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
> 

ok you did not understand the purpose of the thread was.



> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp

yeah works great everyone is happy that is why they are looking for
alternatives


> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.
> 

ok, 1 nak form someone that missed the point and a pile of folks that
think its good and welcome that prpl is starting to work in public
rather than doing back room deals behind closed doors.

</thread>


> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.
>>
>> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
>>
>> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp
>>
>> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to.
>>>
>>> the list is  non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why
>>> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read
>>> it.
>>>
>>> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state
>>> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its
>>> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in
>>> creating such code.
>>>
>>> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having
>>> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic.
>>>
>>> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to
>>> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be
>>> open/transparent" ones.
>>>
>>> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ?
>>>
>>>         John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote:
>>>> Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we
>>>> need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to
>>>> Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list".
>>>> Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this
>>>> conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank".
>>>> Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you!
>>>>
>>>> JohnA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic
>>>>> behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
>>>>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
>>>>>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Lang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
>>>>>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical
>>>>>>> development issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> etiquette such as found here :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a
>>>>>>> corporate conspiracy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Free Software is meant to be free ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s)
>>>>>>> torques me off every time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz
>>>>>>> <eschultz at prplfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks
>>>>>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in
>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>> to the prplwrt list at openwrt at lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no
>>>>>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what
>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>> would prefer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
>>>>>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org
>>>>>>>> eschultz at prplfoundation.org
>>>>>>>> cell: 920-539-0404
>>>>>>>> skype: ericschultzwi
>>>>>>>> @EricPrpl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>
>>