[LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

[L. D. Pinney]

OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.

Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.

Notably freecwmp and easycwmp

NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com> wrote:
> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.
>
> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
>
> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp
>
> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <john at phrozen.org> wrote:
>>
>> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to.
>>
>> the list is  non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why
>> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read
>> it.
>>
>> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state
>> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its
>> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in
>> creating such code.
>>
>> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having
>> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic.
>>
>> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to
>> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be
>> open/transparent" ones.
>>
>> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ?
>>
>>         John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote:
>> > Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we
>> > need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to
>> > Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list".
>> > Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this
>> > conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank".
>> > Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you!
>> >
>> > JohnA
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>> >> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>> >> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic
>> >> behavior.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
>> >>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
>> >>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
>> >>>
>> >>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>> >>>
>> >>> David Lang
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
>> >>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com>
>> >>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical
>> >>>> development issues.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail
>> >>>> list
>> >>>> etiquette such as found here :
>> >>>>
>> >>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a
>> >>>> corporate conspiracy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Free Software is meant to be free ...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s)
>> >>>> torques me off every time.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz
>> >>>> <eschultz at prplfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks
>> >>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in
>> >>>>> addition
>> >>>>> to the prplwrt list at openwrt at lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no
>> >>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox
>> >>>>> will
>> >>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what
>> >>>>> people
>> >>>>> would prefer.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Eric
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
>> >>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org
>> >>>>> eschultz at prplfoundation.org
>> >>>>> cell: 920-539-0404
>> >>>>> skype: ericschultzwi
>> >>>>> @EricPrpl
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>> >>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>> >>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>> >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>> >>>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Lede-dev mailing list
>> >> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Lede-dev mailing list
>> > Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
>