[PATCH V4 0/6] Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs

Atish Patra atishp at atishpatra.org
Mon Mar 18 12:37:46 PDT 2024


On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:39 AM Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:27:03PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:50:51PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is a new (V4) version of this series to create tests to cover functions
> > > > of the riscv's SBI base implementation spec. The series also includes a
> > > > a few helpers to reduce code duplication.
> > > >
> > > > This new version includes updates related to Drew reviews, and rebasing of
> > > > the patches according to the changes.
> > > > This new series has also been rebased on TOT, didn't affect the patches,
> > > > but worth the heads up.
> > > >
> > > > Patches tagged with V4 needed modifications from the previous version.
> > > >
> > > > Detailed updates are specified on a patch-basis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Carlos Maiolino (6):
> > > >   riscv: Add a wrapper to call sbi_ecall for base extension
> > > >   riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension
> > > >   riscv: Factor out environment variable check and report generation
> > > >   riscv: Implement test for architecture ID register
> > > >   riscv: Enable gen_report() to print the wrong value in case of failure
> > > >   riscv: Test for specific SBI implementation ID
> > > >
> > > >  riscv/sbi.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.44.0
> > > >
> > >
> > > Merged to https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests
> >
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > I just realized you've forgotten to CC tech-prs on v3 and v4.
>
> I actually didn't CC them on purpose. The list seems to only accept incoming emails from registered
> users, so all previous attempts I got a bunch of delivery failure messages, so I thought it was
> pointless to CC them. I should get myself registered there, but I didn't have time so far to figure
> it out.
>
Here are the details.
https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-prs

IIRC, you also need to be an individual member or employee of a RVI
member company to subscribe to PRS.

@Andrew Jones : I don't think it is possible for every contributor for
kvm-unit-tests to be a member of RVI
and subscribe to PRS.

Maybe we should just send periodic updates ? I am not sure if there is
a better way to do cross-posting.

> Carlos.
>
> >
> > drew
>
> --
> kvm-riscv mailing list
> kvm-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish



More information about the kvm-riscv mailing list