[PATCH V4 0/6] Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs

[Carlos Maiolino]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:27:03PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:50:51PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is a new (V4) version of this series to create tests to cover functions
> > > of the riscv's SBI base implementation spec. The series also includes a
> > > a few helpers to reduce code duplication.
> > >
> > > This new version includes updates related to Drew reviews, and rebasing of
> > > the patches according to the changes.
> > > This new series has also been rebased on TOT, didn't affect the patches,
> > > but worth the heads up.
> > >
> > > Patches tagged with V4 needed modifications from the previous version.
> > >
> > > Detailed updates are specified on a patch-basis
> > >
> > >
> > > Carlos Maiolino (6):
> > >   riscv: Add a wrapper to call sbi_ecall for base extension
> > >   riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension
> > >   riscv: Factor out environment variable check and report generation
> > >   riscv: Implement test for architecture ID register
> > >   riscv: Enable gen_report() to print the wrong value in case of failure
> > >   riscv: Test for specific SBI implementation ID
> > >
> > >  riscv/sbi.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.44.0
> > >
> >
> > Merged to https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> I just realized you've forgotten to CC tech-prs on v3 and v4.

I actually didn't CC them on purpose. The list seems to only accept incoming emails from registered
users, so all previous attempts I got a bunch of delivery failure messages, so I thought it was
pointless to CC them. I should get myself registered there, but I didn't have time so far to figure
it out. 

Carlos.

> 
> drew