[PATCH V4 0/6] Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs

[Andrew Jones]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:37:46PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:39 AM Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:27:03PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:50:51PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> > > > > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a new (V4) version of this series to create tests to cover functions
> > > > > of the riscv's SBI base implementation spec. The series also includes a
> > > > > a few helpers to reduce code duplication.
> > > > >
> > > > > This new version includes updates related to Drew reviews, and rebasing of
> > > > > the patches according to the changes.
> > > > > This new series has also been rebased on TOT, didn't affect the patches,
> > > > > but worth the heads up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Patches tagged with V4 needed modifications from the previous version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Detailed updates are specified on a patch-basis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos Maiolino (6):
> > > > >   riscv: Add a wrapper to call sbi_ecall for base extension
> > > > >   riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension
> > > > >   riscv: Factor out environment variable check and report generation
> > > > >   riscv: Implement test for architecture ID register
> > > > >   riscv: Enable gen_report() to print the wrong value in case of failure
> > > > >   riscv: Test for specific SBI implementation ID
> > > > >
> > > > >  riscv/sbi.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.44.0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Merged to https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests
> > >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > I just realized you've forgotten to CC tech-prs on v3 and v4.
> >
> > I actually didn't CC them on purpose. The list seems to only accept incoming emails from registered
> > users, so all previous attempts I got a bunch of delivery failure messages, so I thought it was
> > pointless to CC them. I should get myself registered there, but I didn't have time so far to figure
> > it out.
> >
> Here are the details.
> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-prs
> 
> IIRC, you also need to be an individual member or employee of a RVI
> member company to subscribe to PRS.
> 
> @Andrew Jones : I don't think it is possible for every contributor for
> kvm-unit-tests to be a member of RVI
> and subscribe to PRS.
> 
> Maybe we should just send periodic updates ?

Periodic updates sounds good to me.

Thanks,
drew

> I am not sure if there is
> a better way to do cross-posting.
> 
> > Carlos.
> >
> > >
> > > drew
> >
> > --
> > kvm-riscv mailing list
> > kvm-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Atish