Re: Re: More APs with single ­SSID

newuse at qip.ru newuse
Sun Jan 27 03:43:59 PST 2013


I am not sure if it helps, but you could also try to disallow low MCSs...
What version of supplicant are you using? Try to compile the latest of wpasupplicant, it was reported to be working even under Windows...
IMHO, the problem is related to STA drivers and software. There should be support of the background monitoring...

So the other way you already are using -- kicking STAs by low level...
There was something interesting in 802.11k -- there is a possibility to collect some info from STAs via RADIUS, but I don't remember exactly, if it could be helpful in your case....    

??? 27 ??? 2013 15:20:55 +0400, Milan Krm <krcmar at datinel.cz> ???????:
> As far as I know, the 802.11r does not help to solve the problem
> described. It will speed the handoff process up, but does not
> influence STA's original decision to roam to another AP. My problem is
> much more fundamental than this.
> 
> My problem occurs even in open networks without 802.11i. Imagine a
> notebook (Wi-Fi STA) watching 10 Mbit HD video stream over HTTP with
> client-side buffer of several seconds. When such a notebook moves to
> another room and gets closer to another AP, the user would not mention
> even a 3 seconds interruption of HTTP stream should the STA roam. But
> the STA stays associated with the now weaker AP and must lower
> modulation below 10 Mbit, so the stream stops playing when the buffer
> gets emptied.
> 
> Milan
> _______________________________________________
> HostAP mailing list
> HostAP at lists.shmoo.com
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap

--



More information about the Hostap mailing list